Nowadays almost everyone listens to music through streaming platforms such as Spotify, Deezer, Apple Music, Google Music or even YouTube (even tough it is technically a video streaming platform). This of course, has not always been the case. Before the advent of the internet, and even during its early stages for that matter, one had to buy a record or CD at the record store. Some audiophiles still swear by it that it’s worth to do so, because the audio quality is supposed to be better, but that’s a topic for another time. These streaming platforms allow us to carry a library of music with us that physical stores usually can’t rival. This convenience of streaming music has won over the average consumer and become ‘mainstream’.
This word, mainstream, is interesting when talking about the topic of music, because it is perhaps the field where the word is used most often. Before the sixties, large record companies had so much power and influence over what music was listened to by consumers, that it was very hard to get a foothold as an independent musician or record label. However, with the punk-revolution and other similar developments, the underground music scene started to blossom. This led to the rise of many new genres. This liberation of music even lent its name to one: indie (rock or pop), which in time became mainstream.
‘What does this have to do with music streaming platforms?’ I hear you ask. Well, these platforms do not only give consumers the convenience of listening to a broad array of artists and genres, but by extent it also gives way for artists to publish their music more easily. This again, however, comes with a cost. Maybe even a paradox of some sort. One would assume that if it would be easier for up-and-coming artists to share and publish their music, that they would benefit from it. But this might not be the case. It has become easier for consumers to explore new music, especially through algorithmic based exploration playlists (think of discover weekly on Spotify), but there is also a lot (and I mean A LOT) more music to discover. Getting picked by an algorithm to feature on someone’s discover weekly or to show up on someone’s recommended page on YouTube is almost like winning a lottery. It does not only come down to your talent, but also on luck. Lots and lots of luck.
We should also consider the impact streaming has on revenue for career artists. I think everyone can agree that these platforms are great for people that just want to put their music out there and don’t really care about becoming famous or making a living of it. But for musicians that rely on the money they make form their work it can be detrimental. Streaming is notorious for its low revenue output. Everything comes down to royalties nowadays. Actual sales of physical copies are steadily declining. There are a multitude of royalty calculators online that can show just how much (or how little) you can expect to be paid per stream (here is an example, try it out for yourself). To compensate, this has perhaps also led to an increase in productivity, as artists make more music on average. Live performances and tours, as well as merchandising, has also become more important to fill this drop in income for many.
All in all, the streaming platforms of today have made the lives of consumers easier, but it might have made the lives of your favourite artists harder. So next time you see an actual, physical record store (yeah, they still exist), maybe buy a physical copy.
Great that you wrote about this. I agree with everything you stated in your post. Purchase of a physical album copy now seems to be a sign that someone is a true fan. However, I am a bit more positive when it comes to the help of streaming platforms to budding artists. I don’t exactly know of the processes behind it, but I can imagine that if I’m trying to break out in the music industry, I would definitely publish my album on Spotify and actually physically promote it (bars, open mic, etc), and wouldn’t only rely on the algorithms to push my music. I mean, of course, that would definitely help to reach a larger crowd, but I can also imagine if I increase the number of listeners (even if they are local listeners), I would have more chance to be featured on Discover Weekly? Again, I’m not sure how exactly the algorithm works, so this is merely my 2 cents. Nice read, nonetheless!
Nice topic and I also agree with everything you said.
I think it is hard for musicians who want to publish their music and become “famous” to do so without luck or maybe also paying social media platforms to advertise. If you don´t want to advertise vie social media (for what reasons ever), the music buisness is (was) hard for newcomers.
What a great read! I agree with basically everything you touched upon in your blog, and I really think streaming services (especially you, Spotify) should be doing more in terms of financially compensating artists for the plays their discography gets. I’m not an audiophile so I will not be buying physical albums or releases for the enhanced sound quality, but I might be more tempted to buy a physical copy of an album that’s really meaningful to me or a project from an artist I really want to support that little bit extra, plus, having an actual thing to connect memories to is also a nice thing to have. Thank you once again for your splendid blog post!
Great post and I really enjoyed the ‘royalty calculator’. It seems that I would have to stream a song 270 times for me to provide 1 euro to my favorite artist! Just as anyone I stream music, even my mother nowadays streams everything on Spotify. However, I have started to do exactly what you said and I buy physical copies to support the artists I love. But I cannot give up on Spotify, it is magical. The ease of its use is insane, I can listen to something while I’m going to my pc and just press a button and continue playing it on a different device. I don’t think streaming will ever go out of ‘fashion’, it just offers so much that cd’s and record players don’t.